World

Was there a new variant named Omicron to avoid offending China?

Relations between China and the World Health Organization have been put under new scrutiny after UN agencies seem to skip the Greek letter “Xi” and instead call the new Covid variant “Omicron”. I did.

Last night, WHO was criticized by Chinese hawks after naming the mutation “Omicron” instead of “Nu” or “Xi.”

UN agencies use Greek letters such as “alpha,” “beta,” and “delta” to describe variants, and on their website, “it’s easier and more practical for an unscientific audience to discuss.” That’s it. “

However, the decision to name the southern African variant “Omicron” has sparked speculation that WHO intentionally skipped “Xi Jinping” to avoid offending China’s President Xi Jinping. ..

President Xi is said to have had a major impact on WHO director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, a former Ethiopian minister who is a major recipient of Chinese investment.

Tedros has been accused of using his role to make better appointments than Beijing, including making Zimbabwe’s dictator Robert Mugabe a goodwill ambassador.

The Chinese government has been accused of using “aggressive” influence campaigns in WHO’s response to the first Covid outbreak that missed a chance to stop the pandemic. It is also said that the independence of UN agencies was undermined before the virus spread worldwide in early 2020.

Republican Senator Ted Cruz retweeted a telegraph editor citing WHO sources, saying Xi was skipped to “keep the area stigmatized.”

President Xi is said to have had a major impact on WHO director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, a former Ethiopian minister who is a major recipient of Chinese investment.

The relationship between China and the World Health Organization has been further scrutinized after UN agencies seemed to skip the Greek letter

The relationship between China and the World Health Organization has been further scrutinized after UN agencies seemed to skip the Greek letter “Xi” and instead call the new Covid variant “Omicron.”

Omicron cases have already been covered in South Africa, Botswana, Hong Kong, Israel and Belgium.It is not yet known if the variant arrived in the Netherlands yesterday, but Dutch authorities are ordering passenger tests.

What do we know about Omicron variants?

Scientists say they are concerned about the B.1.1.529 mutant, which was named Omicron by the World Health Organization. This is because there are about 30 different mutations, twice the amount present in the delta mutant. Mutations include traits not previously found, as well as features found in all other subspecies.

British scientists first noticed the new strain on November 23, after samples were uploaded to the coronavirus variant tracking website from South Africa, Hong Kong, and Botswana.

Cases were confirmed in Israel and Belgium on Friday, but there are currently no known cases in the United Kingdom.

Professor Adam Finn, a member of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI), will be sequenced across the UK on Friday in Good Morning Britain to determine if cases have already been imported. He said he was.

Work is also underway to determine if the new variants are causing new infections in people who have already been vaccinated with the coronavirus or vaccine, or if weakened immunity is playing a role.

Professor James Naismith, director of the Rosalind Franklin Institute in Oxford, said the new variant “almost certainly” reduces the effectiveness of the vaccine, but it is still protective.

Pfizer / BioNTech, which manufactures vaccines against Covid-19, is already investigating the ability of new variants to evade vaccines.

“If WHO is so afraid of the Chinese Communist Party, how can we trust them to call them when they are trying to hide a catastrophic pandemic?” Said.

The Wall Street Journal columnist Benzimer suggested:

A WHO spokesman told the New York Post that he avoided “Nu” because he was afraid that “people might think it’s a new variant, not a name.”

They added:’And Xi is a generic name, because we agree. [to] Naming conventions that avoid the use of place names, people’s names, animals, etc. to avoid stigma.

Earlier this year, a study by The Sunday Times revealed Beijing’s efforts to manage WHO decision-making, sabotage investigations, and staffing.

The newspaper claims that WHO was unable to publicly challenge China’s misinformation, delaying the declaration of an international emergency and discouraging the government from issuing a travel ban to protect China’s economy. doing.

It is also suggested that authorities have agreed to a “closed-door deal” with the Chinese to shed light on the investigation into the origin of Covid-19.

This meant keeping scientists away from the theory that the coronavirus actually escaped from the Wuhan Institute rather than coming from wildlife at the city’s fresh market in December 2019.

This theory was initially dismissed by WHO as “very unlikely”, but experts now state that there may have been “human error” in the lab.

At the heart of this paper’s claim is that the close relationship between WHO leadership and China has influenced the country’s ability to challenge the emergence of the virus.

It has been suggested that China has used its financial leverage over poor countries for some time to introduce preferred stock into the key roles of WHO and other UN government agencies.

The most important WHO decision maker is Tedros, a longtime friend of China. He visited President West in January 2020, two months before the pandemic began.

Between 2000 and 2012, there were about 130 official Chinese financial projects in Zimbabwe, spending a total of hundreds of millions of pounds on the construction of hydroelectric dams and the provision of agricultural machinery.

Last June, Zimbabwe was one of the 53 countries that upheld Hong Kong’s National Security Act at the United Nations and was ridiculed by Western nations for cracking down on protesters and China’s freedom of speech.

Professor Richard Ebright, a fellow of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, told the Times that China’s efforts had a “decisive role” in influencing the failure of government agencies to act.

“There was no scientific, medical or policy justification for the WHO’s January and February 2020 stance, which was to maintain a completely satisfactory relationship with the Chinese government. It was a premise, “he said.

“Through that process, WHO has actively resisted and hampered the efforts of other countries to implement effective border control that may limit or contain the spread of outbreaks. . ”

According to the investigation, China has used its

According to the investigation, China has used its “active” influence over the World Health Organization to control decision-making, disrupt investigations, and even set up priority authorities in preparation for a coronavirus pandemic.

China tried to claim that the virus had originated elsewhere, but scholars, politicians, and the media began to consider the possibility of the virus leaking from Wuhan's high-level biochemical laboratory-Chinese authorities simply Raises suspicion of hiding evidence of early spread

China tried to claim that the virus had originated elsewhere, but scholars, politicians, and the media began to consider the possibility of the virus leaking from Wuhan’s high-level biochemical laboratory-Chinese authorities simply Raises suspicion of hiding evidence of early spread

Assistance to Tedros was particularly “remarkably high in return on investment” compared to the funds and influence used to help him be elected.

A spokesperson for the organization countered the claim that “WHO’s top priority is to end the acute phase of the Covid-19 pandemic.”

They later added:

“There were several independent reviews of the global response to Covid-19, including the work of WHO. These reviews refer to the work of the organization and the early warnings we issued.

“Frankly, WHO’s top priority is to end the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, which is comprehensive based on the consistent use of public health measures and the impartial use of life-saving tools, including: We are supporting countries to implement evidence-based responses.

“Especially when 75% of vaccinations are given in only 10 countries, all countries are working to ensure that healthcare workers, the elderly and other vulnerable groups are vaccinated.”

Was there a new variant named Omicron to avoid offending China?

Source link Was there a new variant named Omicron to avoid offending China?

Back to top button