Supreme Court accepting cases that could overturn Roe v. Wade

Wednesday, December 1, 2021-The majority of judges in the United States Supreme Court on Wednesday believe that there is no constitutional right to abortion, or at least the state has the ability to determine when a pregnancy can occur. Seemed to accept the finished.

The judge heard from a lawyer who agreed and opposed the 2018 Mississippi law, banned abortion after 15 weeks, and claimed that the foetation could survive outside the womb at that age.Supreme Court 1973 Roe v. Wade Decades of judgment and legal judgment, including the 1992 judgment Planned parent-child relationship v.Casey, Says that abortion should be available until feasible — established as about 23 weeks.

The court also ruled in Casey that state law cannot “excessively burden” a woman’s ability to have an abortion.

The Mississippi Attorney General did not initially seek capsizing egg When Casey, But discussed later Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization In both cases it was determined incorrectly and should be completely destroyed.

Scott G. Stewart, Mississippi Solicitor, said:

When accepting the Mississippi proceedings, the Supreme Court did not agree to consider subversion. egg Also CaseyHowever, the tendency of judges during the trial is clear and they may abandon those groundbreaking cases.

Judge Clarence Thomas, like Judge Samuel Alito, repeatedly called on law challengers to point out where the right to abortion is written in the Constitution.

“If we were talking about the second amendment, I know exactly what we are talking about. If we are talking about the fourth amendment, I am talking about it. I know that, “What exactly are we talking about here?” He asked US Attorney General Elizabeth Prelogger.

She said the right to abortion is embedded in 14.NS Guarantee of amendments to the pursuit of freedom.

“If this court waives the interests of liberty granted in egg Reconfirmed in Casey, That would be an unprecedented reduction in personal rights, “she said.

Chief Justice John Roberts seemed to oppose abandoning any of the groundbreaking abortion cases, but instead wanted to focus on whether 15 weeks was a reasonable time. is. But he seemed to be the only one focusing on the issue.

“Roberts looks desperate for some limiting principles that don’t reverse egg, And no other conservative judge is biting. ” Tweet Mary Ziegler, A historian who wrote about abortion.

But Judge Neil Gorsuch, Judge Amy Coney Barrett, and Judge Brett Kavanaugh all have precedents. egg When Casey There is a possibility of capsizing.

Neal Katyal, Former Deputy Secretary of State, Supreme Court Attorney, Tweeted during the discussion “So far, I have nothing to sympathize with the challenger, and it was very hostile.”

He warned that the question during the oral argument was “often just trying to understand the position of a lawyer,” adding that “but the tea leaves here are ominous.”

If Roe v. Wade overturned, 22 states According to the Guttmacher Institute, there are already laws in the book that can be used to limit abortion. Almost in 12 states with so-called “trigger” laws: Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, and Utah. All abortions are prohibited.

There are abortion restrictions in 17 states that have not been enforced or blocked by courts and will re-enable if Roe becomes invalid. The additional seven states have legislation intended to limit abortion in the absence of abortion. egg And the four states have passed constitutional amendments, especially to not protect the right to abortion.

Guttmacher reports that 15 states and Washington, DC have passed legislation that protects the right to abortion.

Jackson Women’s Health, the state’s only abortion provider, has sought to stop the Mississippi state law shortly after it was passed. A federal judge ruled against the state, and the decision was upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The Supreme Court of May 2021 agreed to accept the Mississippi appeal.

In early November, the Supreme Court heard discussions in two proceedings against Texas’s restrictive law. Overall female health v Jackson When USA v Texas.. The judge seemed to accept the idea that Law SB8 was unconstitutional. However, the court did not grant the Biden administration’s request to suspend the law while the opposition passed the court.

Supreme Court accepting cases that could overturn Roe v. Wade

Source link Supreme Court accepting cases that could overturn Roe v. Wade

Back to top button