“Terrible Trade-offs”: Brett Sutton did not ask if beating St. Basil’s staff would put residents at risk | Victoria

Victoria’s Supreme Health Officer is seriously concerned about the safety of the population if senior clinical staff at the St. Basil Geriatric Care Facility follow instructions from the state government to dismiss all staff in the event of a Covid outbreak. He told an investigation of the coronary arteries that he was unaware that he had caused.

In July and August 2020, 94 residents and 94 staff were infected with the virus. Forty-five residents died of Covid and five more died of negligence as the workforce succumbed to the virus and a gap in infection control became apparent.

On July 19, the Victorian Health Department ordered anyone who worked from home between July 1st and 15th to declare close contact and quarantine. This made it necessary to replace all employees with agency staff by July 22nd.

However, inquests have heard that the federal government is struggling to procure alternative workers for outbreaks elsewhere.

For hours and days after staff changes, the virus continued to spread throughout the house, leaving residents missing food, medicine, and laundry, leading to negligence and death.

Inquests are investigating whether there were alternatives open to state and federal governments other than dismissing and replacing all staff. We are also investigating the adequacy of the alternative workforce in St. Basil and whether the state and federal governments are in good contact.

Professor Brett Sutton, chief health officer in Victoria, said it would be nearly impossible for senior staff in his department to put together replacements for concerns raised by federal staff and home doctors, leaving residents behind. He said he had never said he was afraid. Without basic care, including food and medicine.

QC, a lawyer who assists inquests, told Sutton on Friday: [replacing the staff] … but you didn’t ask as well. “

“I didn’t ask,” Sutton replied. However, he relies on senior staff to communicate serious issues and hopes to be able to mobilize senior care staff from areas that are largely unaffected by the virus, including parts of Victoria in the area. Said that he was.

He said he and other officials and managers were left with “a set of risks that were very difficult to balance” because he knew how infectious the virus was and how quickly it spread. ..

“There was a terrible trade-off between providing care and welfare for the risk of infection,” Sutton said, and believes that if former staff are allowed to stay on-site, the risk of further expansion is high. Added.

He said he did not know what percentage of the 94 staff members who were eventually infected were part of the original or alternative workforce.

Sutton said the virus may have increased at home as a former manager of a nursing home for the elderly in St. Basil refused to immediately accept a layoff order from the Victorian Health Department. Stated.

The court heard that St. Basil’s manager, Con Contis, wrote a letter stating that he did not intend to instruct staff to leave the facility without official instructions. Although the verbal order from the Ministry of Health had legal weight, Sutton approved a letter ordering Farraf to give additional authority to the instruction.

“Reading Mr. Contis’s letter made him believe that when his staff was clearly ridiculous, his staff became a positive case and there was no risk of transmission within the facility as an alternative staff. It suggests that, “Sutton said.

“Therefore, I refused to dismiss staff who were considered close contacts. In my understanding, refusing to accept the following instructions given on the 19th means that the surge of labor. It means that power planning and preparation was not accelerated. “

Kontis will submit evidence at a later date prior to the inquest.

“Terrible Trade-offs”: Brett Sutton did not ask if beating St. Basil’s staff would put residents at risk | Victoria

Source link “Terrible Trade-offs”: Brett Sutton did not ask if beating St. Basil’s staff would put residents at risk | Victoria

Back to top button