Senate breaks crackdown on philanthropic coalitions | Australian News

The Senate has banned rules to crack down on charitable advocacy. This is the government’s big defeat in the penultimate week of the year.

At work Thursday afternoon, Greens and Crossbench joined in support of a disapproval driven by independent senator Rex Patrick.Nevertheless, one country participated in the push Fear that they may have been set to the power of the green light to investigate charities and cancel registration..

Charity advocacy will be further discussed in the Senate when the government’s political activist bill is considered next week.

The bill aims to reduce the disclosure standard for political spending from $ 500,000 to $ 100,000. The government is wary of a surge in recent amendments to the philanthropic sector, expanding its retroactive effects and expanding to include Voices groups that raise funds for independents.

Charity regulation would have allowed Australians Charity The Nonprofit Commission investigates and deregisters charities and nonprofits to engage in or promote various misdemeanors.

The sector warns that this change could deregister the entire organization on suspicion of minor crimes (eg trespassing or harassment) and limit its ability to participate in protests.

The government had Ignored the recommendations of the Liberal Party-led committee It turns out that the broad new authority of regulatory agencies threatens freedom of speech and should be abandoned.

News Corp Australia Reported on Monday A country, which had not previously decided on a change, has signed a contract with the government to uphold its power to oppose the opposition, provided that it better protects the Church from the change.

But on Thursday afternoon, the Senate voted 24 to 19 to abolish power, and Senators Sterling Glyph and Jackie Lambie voted against Patrick, Labor, and Greens.

Two senators from one country did not attend the vote, but voted in pairs with the Labor Party and Crossbench, reducing the number of government votes by two.

Patrick tells Guardian Australia: “It’s been a long week, but one of the last votes to the Senate provided a great service to the philanthropic department. Thank you to the Senate.”

Kasy Chambers, director of Anglicare Australia, said the vote was “a victory not only for charities and the people we serve, but also for democracy.”

“If they were allowed to stand, the rules would have meant that charities could be targeted and closed for subjective reasons,” she said.

“They were designed to prevent organizations like Anglicare Australia from speaking for our community by punishing us.

“This vote means that we can continue to speak for those who do not have a say in public debate.”

“This is an important victory for human rights and charities across Australia, now that their advocacy is more important than ever,” said Alice Drury of the Center for Human Rights Law.

Drury accused the government of trying to silence charities with a “thousand-cut death strategy” in connection with ACNC’s power, and political activists have imposed “more red tapes” on charities. Blame.

On Monday, the House of Representatives passed a government political activist bill, which is listed for debate in the Senate but is unlikely to be voted on until next week.

On Wednesday and Thursday, the government rejected the Senate’s request for consideration of the bill, despite the surge in amendments on Monday, arguing that Crossbench needed further scrutiny.

This change broadens the definition of “election issues” that require political activists to declare spending “in relation to elections,” and broadly exaggerates attempts by charities and nonprofits to influence voters. There is a definition.

The amendment also broadens the definition of political activists to organizations that operate for the main purpose of financing for election spending – some fears are grassroots funding like voice for independence. Directed to the organization.

Hands Off Our Charities, an alliance of 80 charities, urged Senators to oppose the change as “the latest in a long line of governments trying to silence civil society statements.”

They said the category of political activists “confused independent issue-based advocacy with” party political “or partisan movements.”

Charitable organizations are not allowed to be politically partisan and may only engage in advocacy activities to support charitable purposes.

“But the” political activist “label gives the misleading impression that charities are spending money on party activities during the elections. This poses a significant reputation and regulatory risk to us, “they said.

Senate breaks crackdown on philanthropic coalitions | Australian News

Source link Senate breaks crackdown on philanthropic coalitions | Australian News

Back to top button