Linda Reynolds says NDIS relies too much on the “natural empathy” of civil servants | National Disability Insurance System

Linda Reynolds defended the government’s controversial proposal to introduce an independent assessment, arguing that the country’s disability insurance system relies too much on the judgment of individual civil servants and “their natural empathy.” did.

In front of the Parliamentary Commission on Tuesday, Minister NDIS repeated her claim The plan was on an “unsustainable growth trajectory” However, some groups of persons with disabilities admitted that they were “very angry” and felt left out of the government’s decision to review the system.

She confirmed that the government would enact legislation to implement the policy this year, but the design was Ongoing trials and extensive consultation with Reynolds disability groups..

Reynolds also said the government intends to pursue a redefinition of “reasonable and necessary” legal tests for financing as part of a review of NDIS legislation, which could eliminate some support. He said he had sex.

She said confusion about the meaning of “reasonable and necessary” meant that planning staff could not make “timely,” “accurate, consistent, and fair” decisions.

“I think we rely too much on the judgment of individual civil servants and their natural empathy,” she said.

National Rehabilitation Agency said it believes People’s treatment professionals can be affected by “empathy bias”Previously, it did not suggest that the same concept would apply to civil servants making plans in plans, as Reynolds did on Tuesday.

The government has proposed an independent evaluation It was carried out by a contracted medical company to replace the evidence provided by a person’s treatment specialist because it stated that the current process was inconsistent.

But disability advocates believe that reform is aimed at reducing costs. This is due to the growing rhetoric of the government’s “scheme sustainability”. Leaked document recently reported by Guardian Australia..

Reynolds was asked by Labor lawmaker Alicia Payne about the fact that the disabled community was “fully united” in opposition to policy, saying that “the sector itself is not always homogeneous.”

“I’m concerned about how we do it, or how the exams were conducted and communicated,” she said.

“There were already some great suggestions from the disabled community on how we could improve that process, so I totally reject your claim.”

Mr Payne said it reflected an overwhelmingly negative view of the policy from the group of persons with disabilities who submitted their submissions to the NDIS Joint Standing Committee, which is considering the proposal.

At the government’s suggestion, the committee conducts a series of questionnaires (called evaluation tools) for participants and applicants, and uses the data to assign different scores to people according to their function. I heard that you will perform a task for your home. ..

Hoffman said these scores were “used to determine the planning budget,” subject to planning meetings.

The Commission has heard that an individual’s score is entered into one of the 400 “reference groups” that take into account the type of disability, age, and other factors, which allows a “typical and flexible planning budget” to be determined. It was.

Proposal critics, such as Bruce Bonyhady, the first chair of the NDIA and former scheme architect, named the process the “Robo Project.”

But another former architect of the scheme, former productivity commissioner John Walsh, told the Commission on Tuesday that he supported an independent assessment.

Walsh, who suffers from a high level of quadriplegia, says they are part of the initial design and should be implemented fairly early in the deployment of the scheme to ensure they are “sustainable”. Said.

“Introducing an independent assessment can be a difficult and complex task,” Walsh said. “It’s much more difficult than it was implemented at the beginning of the scheme.

“But what went well is an important factor in NDIS recovery and success.”

The Commission also heard that there was no guarantee that the assessor would have. Expertise in the disability of the person being evaluated..

Oliver Bladek, Deputy Chief Executive Officer of the NDIA, said assessors will receive an additional 24 hours of training on assessment tools and NDIS methods that complement higher education.

“So, is the speech therapist … qualified enough to help people with cerebral palsy, spinal cord injury and a variety of other disabilities with 24 hours of additional training?” Asked Chairman Kevin Andrews. It was.

Hoffman said no one was pretending to be a “medical expert” due to the nature of the participants’ cases. “We are talking about assessing functional competence,” he said.

Reynolds and NDIA CEO Martin Hofmann I also asked about the case of 9-year-old Eliza Tape., An independent assessment of the trial said she had no concerns about mobility. This was pointed out elsewhere in her assessment, despite the fact that she uses a wheelchair.

“Learn about a particular question and how to use it,” Hoffman said.

Ross Joyce, Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Federation Disability The organization told the Commission that “trust is now broken” between the disabled community and the NDIA.

Damian Griffis, Chief Executive Officer of the First Peoples Disability Network, said authorities made little effort to ensure that the assessment was culturally appropriate for people with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders backgrounds. Told.

Under a question from Senator Jordan Steel John, Hoffman also has a marketing deal with Hall and his partner. Reform of agency spruik cost $ 84,000..

Linda Reynolds says NDIS relies too much on the “natural empathy” of civil servants | National Disability Insurance System

Source link Linda Reynolds says NDIS relies too much on the “natural empathy” of civil servants | National Disability Insurance System

Back to top button