Labor has announced it will restore funding to the Environmental Defenders Office, a law firm that was abruptly cut off by the Abbott government in 2013.
The Attorney General in the Shadows Markus Dreyfus and Labor’s environment spokesman Terri Butler Let’s say if Labor is elected he will commit $8 million over four years to the specialized legal center.
The termination of Commonwealth funding to the EDOs in 2013 ended decades of bipartisan funding support. EDOs were also barred from restoring federal funding to other municipal justice centers in 2015.
Dreyfus and Butler said the EDO has a history of fighting for Australians “who want to uphold our laws, enforce their legal rights and protect Australia’s precious natural resources”.
Mr. Morrison has continued Tony Abbott’s destructive, anti-environmental policies at the expense of farmers and other local Australians, Aboriginal people, Australia’s valuable natural environment and the agriculture, tourism and other vital industries that support a healthy environment.
Labor believes that all Australians and especially those living in regional and outlying Australia and First Nations should be able to defend their rights in court.”
The EDO has brought landmark legal challenges to court in the past. It is currently representing youth organization Youth Verdict in a challenge to Clive Palmer’s Galilee coal project. The case is the first to challenge a coal mine on First Nations human rights grounds in Australia.
David MorrisEDO’s chief executive welcomed the pledge of funding, saying it was a recognition of the work the legal service had done in the public interest.
Many Australians – particularly in remote and regional areas – do not have access to legal support on environmental issues, either due to a lack of services in their area or the prohibitive cost of legal advice.
We offer an expert service to people who otherwise could not afford lawyers, enabling them to question and challenge the decisions and actions of powerful interests that affect the environment.”
Given the focus on calculations and how that Anton Albanese Press conference ended (they are being hounded over cost issues) Labor’s Jim Chalmers and Katy Gallagher try to forestall the attacks by releasing this statement:
The facts about the Morrison government’s lavish spending speak for themselves –
- The Morrison government taxed more, spent more and borrowed more than its Labor predecessor, but delivered much less.
- The Liberals tax more than the last Labor government by any measure – overall, as a share of the economy, per person and adjusted for inflation.
- Taxes have been higher every year under this Liberal government than Labour’s inherited levels.
- They are the government with the second highest taxes in the last thirty years – the highest under John Howard.
- While they try to make a virtue of their tax-to-GDP cap, the fact is that the current cap has only been breached four times since Federation, and each time under the Liberals.
- The Liberals are spending $230 billion more this year than their predecessor, compared to the last Labor government in 2013.
- Under the last Labor government, spending averaged 24.9 per cent of the economy, but under the Liberals it is 26.5 per cent.
- The Liberal government announced spending of $70 billion between the December update and the March budget alone, with no offset.
- The Liberal government has pledged $39 billion in its uncompensated budget.
- Analysis in the media shows that the Liberals made $23.3 billion in announcements in the month following the 2022 budget — equivalent to $833 million a day.
- After promising surpluses in the first and every year, the Liberal government has posted more consecutive deficits since the 1920s than any other government.
With that record, it’s not surprising that Liberals doubled the debt before the pandemic started.
Meanwhile, a climate battle is buzzing in New Zealand ahead of next year’s election, as AAP Reports:
Next year’s elections in New Zealand are looming as a brawl over climate policy after the opposition National Party signaled a clear rejection of the government’s emissions reduction plan.
On Monday, Jacinda Arderns government published a plan four years in the making since the introduction of the Zero Carbon Act in 2018.
This law created the independent Climate Change Commission (CCC) to advise on emissions budgets and proposals to reduce greenhouse gas consumption, all of which fed into NZ$2.9 billion (AUD$2.62 billion) worth of proposals that were unveiled this week.
The government will offer a cash-for-clunkers program to enable poorer Kiwis to trade dirtier cars, plant native forests, invest in decarbonization and fund research to reduce agricultural emissions while trying to expand its international to stay true to the climate promise.
The plan was panned by academics and Greenpeace for its timidity and, somewhat surprisingly, by the National Party for company handouts.
“The taxpayer should not subsidize big companies to reduce emissions,” said the opposition leader Chris Luxon called.
“Big companies should be able to do that now. You have to move forward and keep going with this program.”
Luxon says the plan is “a lot of mush,” citing an analysis by the Stuff news agency that found more than half of the 284 “actions” in the plan were actually “plans to make other plans.”
However, there is no argument about the need to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. According to Luxon, National “is a firm believer in New Zealand’s international commitments and emissions budgets, which will peak before 2025 and decline drastically over the next decade.
This press conference ended with Anton Albanese He left as questions about the cost were still being raised and some journalists were trying to follow him.
Josh Butler was there and will have more for you
And the press conference ends.
Q: Is it fair for Australian voters to release it on Thursday? Does that give them enough time to digest your offer and have us review it?
Let’s be very clear here. They currently have an $80 billion deficit. They have $1 trillion in debt. This government has spent $70 billion.
They have our announcements, every single one of them, we have made a calculation. We have been transparent on these issues throughout the campaign.
And the other thing we’ve done in terms of fiscal responsibility is to point out how fiscally irresponsible it is for the government to promote policies that result in a larger number of people potentially being dependent on the pension and not on their own retirement savings. And I’ll close on this point: the costs and expenses that we have incurred are to blame.
They pale in comparison to the waste and hassle peppered by that budget: $5.5 billion for French subs is more… than any of the pledges we’ve made during this campaign, the biggest of which is childcare.
Q: Do you know if your projected deficit is higher or lower than the coalition’s?
We’ll announce that on Thursday. No point in announcing it now… I want you to be there on Thursday. I do not want to disappoint you.
Q: This morning you mentioned your childcare policy. They said there would be a return to government with productivity gains. Could you please describe the productivity gains you anticipate, separate from participation, which is well understood.
Thanks. Childcare does two things. One is… labor force participation is increasing, removing the structural impediment for women to work a fourth or fifth day. This means that these women have better chances of advancement.
That means they earn more income. That means they pay more taxes. It also means that companies get productivity gains, which is why our policies have such strong support from business. Because when you have greater input in terms of workforce capacity, that’s one of the ways productivity grows. So this, if for individuals, is also good for companies in terms of the growth that is there. That’s a significant economic incentive… Taking part is a good thing.
Q: You said you will be a prime minister answering the questions. You were asked this morning about deficits, whether higher or lower, and you didn’t answer that… Aren’t you doing exactly what you accused the Prime Minister of – not being transparent?
Not at all. And I’ll be at the National Press Club tomorrow.
Our expense policy will be published on Thursday. We’ve made that very clear. But we also tied dollars to every single announcement we made.
Q: Today you spoke full of admiration of modern labor economics. Isn’t it true that Keating lowered manufacturing tariffs and exposed the industry to competition? What you are doing is exposing the market.
What we are doing here is providing a fund… similar to the Clean Energy Finance Corporation model that has worked incredibly effectively in supporting Australian industry and Australian jobs. This works. And let me tell you what doesn’t work. It builds a train that doesn’t fit in a station.
Australia 2022 general election live: Albanese rules out raising Labor’s 2030 emissions reduction target | Australia Elections 2022
Source link Australia 2022 general election live: Albanese rules out raising Labor’s 2030 emissions reduction target | Australia Elections 2022